The Cases for the Cultivation of Hemp

 Being a prolific plant of many uses, the common argument of medicinal and controlled recreational use of Cannabis Sativa and other strains of the Cannabis plant are not enough to impact, imprint, or sway to any significance or consequence of positive repercussions those in the legislative, federal, and law enforcement fields within the United States of North America. The positive argument must and need to contain industrial non-consuming uses of the plant. I am going to use Wikipedia for you to do the basic searching https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemp .
The University of Maryland Eastern Shore had a program to research the medical and other uses before the program was cut off from the public and as a study. https://www.google.com/search?ei=2-H9WZOAOsGymwG-z52wBw&q=marijuana+research+umes&oq=marijuana+research+umes&gs_l=psy-ab.3...14508.15712.0.15990.5.5.0.0.0.0.97.437.5.5.0....0...1..64.psy-ab..0.4.357...0j0i67k1j0i22i30k1j33i160k1j33i21k1.0.wvn29ifUI80

Oh My God! You can smoke your pants! https://www.google.com/search?q=hemp+Levi+jeans&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8 

The Majority of cultivation should be:
1. Basic or Raw materials for production of all sorts
2. Production for consumption as a food product.
3. Production for consumption as a fuel product.
4. Production for consumption as an industrial product.
5. Production for consumption as a textile product.
6. Production for consumption as a medical/medicinal product.
7. Production for consumption for recreational use.

Influencing the structure of the plant to produce certain results:
1. Research and  release openly to the public the exact structure and uses/effects of hemp.
2. Separate each growing region to be dedicated to a certain use/application of the natural and derived products and by-products of the hemp plant.
3. Using naturally based and not synthesized fertilizers, increase the exact compounds -  alkaloid , fatty acids, et al - in the plants for certain uses.
4. Using the example set by George Washington Carver with the peanut plant, find/discover/apply as many positive uses for the hemp plant.

As a means of economy on a global scale:
https://www.google.com/search?ei=iun9WY__IoXrmQHMt6uABw&q=agricultural+economy&oq=agricultural+economy&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0l10.14484.20995.0.21422.20.20.0.0.0.0.113.1861.17j3.20.0....0...1..64.psy-ab..0.20.1852...0i131k1j0i67k1j0i20i263k1j0i20i264k1j0i10i67k1j0i20i263i264k1.0.HOr4UwF148o

That's right, hemp can be used the same as corn, wheat, copra, and other naturally occurring products.





There is enough research to prove that the cultivation of hemp should not be made illegal.
Before making any argument - and not a quarrel - against my presentation, I suggest that you have:
1. At least one  degree in horticulture ,  agriculture, or agricultural sciences
2. At least one degree in medicine applying to the production from extraction and not synthetically created compounds from plant based sources.
3. An understanding at the collegiate level of biochemistry and botany.
4. An understanding at the collegiate level of psychology and sociology from a positive objective viewpoint.
5. Knowledge of what relativity means in reference to the argument for the cultivation of hemp.
6. The ability to combine these studies from different global education institutions as a world study in the cases for naturally derived medicines and other products.
7. The ability to forwardly think about all possible probabilities from the complete collection of all knowledge on this and other related subjects.


Plants may be used for all reasons; however, "getting high" is never reason enough.
If that is your argument for the legalization of marijuana, then you need to be schooled  at both  the College of Real Knowledge and  the University of Practicality,

My argument is both valid and proven.

I thank you for taking the time to read this.

may all of you have a blessed day.